Energy Department scientists have determined that a laboratory leak is the most likely source of the COVID-19 outbreak.
The report got one thing right: it acknowledged “low confidence” in its findings, which means the truth is still up in the air.
COVID-19 Likely Leaked In Wuhan Lab
A lack of confidence does not indicate weakness; on the contrary. It represents frank scientific evaluation and marks a positive shift in the direction of the overconfidently polarized debate.
The DOE’s statement was included in a confidential document that, according to the Wall Street Journal, was given to the White House and a few members of Congress.
The idea that the virus spread to people from an animal in a market has received support from several studies. The market hypothesis was cited by a group of scientists as better fitting the available evidence in a Science article published the previous year.
Yet, crucial evidence from the Wuhan laboratories and marketplaces was misplaced, destroyed, or never gathered. As a result, our data set is lacking.
President Donald Trump nonetheless confidently asserted that he knew the virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology but was unable to provide proof for this.
Then, conventional and social media fact-checkers made the mistake of assuming that a “natural” origin in a live animal market was a fact, going in the opposite way. Anything challenging this was incorrectly branded as false information.
Read more: Cold Feet: Here’s Why do you always feel like walking on ice? What can you do about it?
Coronavirus’ Origin Remains Mystery
In 2021, the White House commissioned a study of the intelligence community’s capabilities and found that the intelligence community was unable to identify the virus’s point of origin.
It was very unlikely that the virus evolved in a lab, according to a World Health Organization team that visited Wuhan to look into the origins of COVID-19. The Biden administration questioned whether China gave the WHO specialists enough access to make a conclusive judgment.
The Energy Department’s conclusion, despite its ambivalence, has given the lab-leak scenario fresh attention, and its proponents are now treating the claim as truth and pushing for a new probe into the improper management of the pandemic.
But, a lot of virologists and epidemiologists have pointed out that there doesn’t seem to be any fresh data in the Energy Department study.
Read more :Researchers: UV nail polish dryer increase risk of Skin Cancer
