Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has vetoed House Bill 68, a controversial piece of legislation that encompassed two acts: the “Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act” and the “Save Women’s Sports Act.”
The former sought to prohibit transgender minors from receiving gender-affirming medical care, while the latter aimed to prevent transgender girls from participating in girls’ and women’s sports.
Governor’s Stance and Administrative Rules
Governor DeWine, in a press conference, stated that he believes certain goals of the bill can be addressed through administrative rules, which could have a better chance of surviving judicial review.
Governor DeWine expressed agreement with concerns raised by the legislature and announced plans to draft rules for gender-affirming care. These rules would include bans on surgeries for minors, reporting and data collection on those receiving care, and restrictions on “pop-up clinics” serving the transgender community.
The bill, if enacted, would have restricted gender-affirming medical care, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries, for transgender individuals under the age of 18.
Physicians argue that such care is often individualized and begins with mental health consultations. The proposed legislation could affect a significant number of transgender youth and families.
Read more: Former Nebraska Rep. Jeff Fortenberry’s Conviction Reversed By Court
Ohio Transgender Legislation Hangs in the Balance
Notably, at least 20 states have implemented restrictions on access to gender-affirming care, with some facing legal challenges. The bill in Ohio could still become law if 60% of the state legislature votes to override the governor’s veto.
Physicians emphasize the safety and effectiveness of gender-affirming care, which has been endorsed by over 20 major national medical associations. Research indicates that such care can improve the mental health of transgender adolescents. Critics argue that the bill interferes with family and physician decisions about healthcare and could harm transgender youth.
The bill also aimed to prevent transgender girls from participating in girls’ and women’s sports, a provision that sparked debate. Ohio’s current high school athletic association policy advocates equal opportunity for transgender student athletes, with specific criteria for participation based on hormone treatment.
Governor DeWine’s veto of House Bill 68 reflects the ongoing national debate over transgender rights and healthcare. The potential impact of such legislation on transgender youth, coupled with the legal and societal implications, underscores the complexity of navigating these issues. As discussions continue, the focus remains on finding a balance between individual rights, healthcare decisions, and inclusivity in sports.
Read more: Sweden Prepares To Join NATO As Turkish Committee Gives Okay
