A recent active shooter incident at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has raised significant concerns regarding the institution’s emergency response and safety protocols.
On August 28, sirens wailed, and cell phones revealed alerts of an active shooter, plunging the campus into confusion.
UNC Campus Shooting Sparks Response Concerns and Student Trauma
Charlotte senior Micah Baldonado described his emotional state during the ordeal. “I know there’s no right way to react, but I just lost it,” he stated.
Baldonado’s instructor continued the lecture after receiving alerts of an active gunman.
During a three-hour lockdown and police search, rumors quickly spread across campus, ultimately leading to the arrest of a UNC graduate student, Tailei Qi, on charges of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm on school property in connection with the shooting death of an associate professor, Zijie Yan.
Baldonado and other pupils criticized the school’s communication, preparedness, and staff response during the crisis.
He has gathered signatures for a petition demanding immediate and substantial enhancements to the protocol for responding to active shooters.
University leaders have defended their response, with UNC Chancellor Kevin Guskiewicz stating, “We couldn’t have asked for a better outcome.”
In most classrooms and auditoriums, QR codes provide quick access to emergency instructions, and staff and resident advisers conduct regular exercises as part of UNC’s emergency response protocol.
Despite the university’s confidence in its response, students have expressed concern regarding the readiness of their instructors and the absence of specific information provided during the closure.
Chief of Police at the University of North Carolina, Brian James, explained that a mass electronic alert and sirens quickly notified the campus of the emergency.
Qi was apprehended within ninety minutes of the initial 911 call.
However, the campus alert system sent an update indicating that the perpetrator was still at large, adding to the student’s confusion.
Read more: Former Proud Boys Leader Receives 15-Year Prison Term For Involvement In January 6 Capitol Attack
UNC Lockdown Sparks Debate on Emergency Response
During the lockdown, an Associated Press reporter saw hundreds of students evacuate buildings without specific instructions before an ‘all clear’ message was issued at 4:14 p.m.
Numerous pupils were left distressed, contacting their parents from sidewalks and unsure of where to go.
While law enforcement searched their building, Baldonado and his classmates asked a police officer to slide a badge under the door because they were dubious if the person outside was a genuine officer.
They were evacuated before the all-clear message and instructed by a university administrator to proceed toward Franklin Street, a central dining and retail district, without knowing whether the shooter had been apprehended.
Liana Evelyn, a freshman majoring in contemporary European studies, characterized being told to continue with their day after a fatal shooting as ‘callous.’
She remembered the initial alarm sounding like movie scenes.
Rick Amweg of Security Risk Management Consultants in Ohio praised UNC police for their prompt initial notification.
He emphasized the significance of withholding information about the swiftly escalating situation until authorities were sure it had been contained and details had been confirmed.
He also praised how UNC police communicated with students and faculty.
Baldonado’s petition requests locks on all classrooms, improved faculty training, and upgrades to the alert system to provide specific, accurate information about active threats, particularly gunmen.
While the incident has raised concerns, it has also prompted a broader discussion regarding the need for enhanced emergency response protocols on college campuses.
Read more: Video Evidence Emerges Of Ohio Officer Fatally Shooting Pregnant Woman Ta’Kiya Young
